Tuesday, March 09, 2010 By: Jerry Bonkowski 8 Responses
WHERE'S THE BEEF IN CARL EDWARDS' "PUNISHMENT"?

Am I missing something here?

Carl Edwards admits he intentionally rammed Brad Keselowski's car Sunday in the closing laps of the Sprint Cup race at Atlanta Motor Speedway, causing Kes's No. 12 Dodge to spin, take flight, flip upside down and crushing half of the top of the car (fortunately it was the right side of the car, not the driver's compartment -- leading to another fortuitous result: Keselowski was shaken but not injured).

And for such an egregious act, Edwards is placed on three weeks of "probation."

That's it. No fine, no suspension, no points deduction -- no other penalty whatsoever.

That's right, absolutely nothing else in terms of being "punished."

NASCAR president Mike Helton said that there were actually two episodes at work here. The first was Edwards' actions. The second was how Keselowski's car unexpectedly went airborn -- something that even Edwards sheepishly admitted he didn't expect to happen when he essentially did a PIT maneuver on Keselowski's ride (if you don't know what a PIT maneuver is, watch some police chases online or on TV and you'll find out soon enough).

So, instead of focusing on the core of the problem -- that Edwards was the aggressor and sent Keselowski flying -- NASCAR has chosen to consider it a more serious and egregious situation that Keselowski's car caught lift at 190 mph and turned Atlanta Motor Speedway's fast racing surface into a takeoff runway.

Let's not put the cart before the horse here. The facts are pretty straightforward: if Edwards doesn't do what he did, Keselowski doesn't wind up the way he did -- regardless of the fact that his car wasn't "supposed" to lift off the ground.

We've already seen the same situation several times in the last few years, particularly at Talladega, where cars have gotten into the air after being hit from behind or from the side. Edwards knows that as well as anybody, as it was Keselowski that gave Edwards the ride of his life a year ago at 'Dega, almost taking out the frontstretch fencing and injuring seven people in the process. Had it not been for good fortune, many more could have been hurt or worse.

NASCAR knows it has a problem with cars lifting up and off into the air. That's why it plans on replacing the rear wing element and return to the old tried-and-true rear spoiler later this season. But given what we saw Sunday at Atlanta, and the fact we have an upcoming off-weekend, wouldn't the prudent thing be to replace the wings with spoilers right now -- particularly in light of what happened with the Edwards-Keselowski imbroglio?

NASCAR's "have at it, boys" philosophy has morphed into a "hands off" policy, it would seem. Even some of NASCAR's hardest and most aggressive drivers, like Clint Bowyer and Kevin Harvick, were nothing short of stunned by NASCAR's action on Tuesday.

Or should I say, lack of action.

I'm not trying to be a maudlin drama queen or conspiracy theorist or anything of the sort, but unless NASCAR starts being a bit more astute at the way it hands out penalties -- in the past, it's penalized guys like Dale Earnhardt Jr. for inadvertently cursing on TV, or Jeff Gordon simply pushing Matt Kenseth (with his hands, not his car) -- something bad is wound to happen.

You know what I mean by that, too. Something bad equals someone gets hurt (or worse), be it a driver, crew member or fan. I would think we have come a long way since Dale Earnhardt lost his life nearly 10 years ago. But by turning such a blind eye to Edwards' actions, we may very well have regressed in some of the progress we've made since Earnhardt's death.

As I said in the headline, where's the beef in NASCAR's "punishment" of Edwards? The answer is simple: the beef is from the fans, the beef is Edwards' blatant ramming of Keselowski, and the beef is NASCAR's almost non-existent penalty in the offing.

Actually, scratch that last one. That's not beef, that's pure bull. 

ALRIGHT, IT'S TIME FOR YOU TO BE HEARD: Head on over to our new site, RACINGDEBATES.com (click on link and it will take you directly there), and let us know what you think about the Edwards "penalty." ALSO, don't forget to cast your vote on Edwards' "punishment" in our new poll at the top left of this page.

Read more...

Sunday, March 07, 2010 By: Jerry Bonkowski 37 Responses
 All photos: Getty Images for NASCAR

NASCAR NEEDS TO MAKE EXAMPLE OF EDWARDS

Comedian Ron White likes to say "You can't fix stupid." Every time he utters that trademark line of his, he gets tons of laughs.

I bring up that line after looking at Carl Edwards' blatant and fairly obvious intentional ramming of Brad Keselowski in Sunday's Sprint Cup race at Atlanta Motor Speedway.

Stupid, Carl, really, really stupid move. It's a move that shouldn't have happened, but I guess what White says definitely applies to Cousin Carl in this case.

Edwards was 156 laps off the pace – 156 laps!!! – and Keselowski was in sixth-place, closing in on a possible top-five finish, when Edwards slammed into Kes, sending him flipping end over end.

Was it payback for an early-race incident between the pair, the one that kept Edwards off the track for nearly half the race? Or perhaps it was come-uppance for last year's race at Talladega, where Keselowski sent Edwards flying – almost into the grandstands (even though it fortunately didn't get past the catchfence, debris from Edwards' car still injured seven spectators) – while Keselowski motored on for the first victory of his Sprint Cup career.

Don't get me wrong, I like NASCAR's new hands-off, "let 'em race" policy, but Edwards' actions were clearly unacceptable and avoidable. And, as nice of a guy as Carl is 99 percent of the the time, I have a hunch his big smile and buff body are going to be hurting come Tuesday, if not Monday.

Given the number of incidents we've already had between drivers in the first four races of the 2010 season – especially incidents between drivers that have a history with each other, like Edwards and Keselowski – someone is going to either kill or hurt someone if this keeps up. NASCAR's "have at it, boys" policy needs to be tweaked so that drivers don't continue taking that phrase to its full meaning.

And if that means someone is going to have to be made an example of to keep that from happening, so be it. The time has come.

That's why NASCAR really has no other choice but to suspend Edwards for one or more races to show not only himself but also every other Cup driver that aggressive driving bordering on near-homicidal is not going to be tolerated.

Edwards needs to be sat for a week at least to make him contemplate his retaliation actions. There's no other route for NASCAR to take or any other way for it to rule. If it lets him off the hook, there are going to be other future confrontations with Keselowski until someone gets hurt – or worse. Ditto for ongoing conflicts between other drivers. Clint Bowyer, Kyle Busch, Denny Hamlin, Keselowski and others, take note, because it could just as easily be you in this instance.

I like Edwards. He's always treated me with respect and friendliness, so this isn't any type of personal vendetta against him. I feel bad that I have to call for his suspension, but at the same time, we can't have him or anyone else going around and purposely putting other people into the fence, especially at a place like Atlanta, which is the fastest track on the circuit.

Think about it: Edwards punted Keselowski at around 190 mph. How many times do we read of regular everyday folks getting killed in their own personal cars in wrecks of 50 mph or less? That Keselowski emerged shaken but not broken or worse is yet another testament to NASCAR's safety program.

And that Keselowski didn't sail into the stands is nothing short of a miracle – especially given how Edwards said after the race that he didn't expect Keselowski's car to take off like it did. Gee, Carl, what DID you expect? Did you think a simple bump-and-run at 190 mph could result in a predictable outcome.

Sorry, but at such high speeds, there is nothing predictable.

I'm not saying Keselowski is without blame. He's an equally significant part of the feud with Edwards. Sure, he made contact with Carl early in Sunday's race, but from how I saw it, the wreck was more of a true accident than the intentional hatchet job Edwards did on his rival later in the same race.

Carl has been racing for a long time and if he doesn't know better by now, there's no question he should. If it takes sitting out a race or two – heck, I wouldn't be surprised if NASCAR parks him for several races to really make a significant example of him – Edwards will hopefully learn the lesson that he obviously must have missed one day in racing school.

What's sad is that if Edwards is parked for more than one race, his season is in effect over. His sponsors, who paid millions of dollars to plaster their names and logos on his race car in hopes of him finally winning the Cup championship in 2010, will in effect be supporting an also-ran for the remainder of the season. They didn't sign on for that, to have their driver turn kamikaze pilot, and bring shame to himself, as well as their corporate image. Look at what Tiger Woods' actions caused him: the loss of several endorsements and sponsors.

While their situations are significantly different, maybe Carl can talk to Tiger about what it's like to mess up big time and be forced to sit out from the sport you love. After all, Carl, wasn't it just seven years ago that you were sitting in a classroom in Columbia, Mo., serving as a substitute teacher, and dreaming about being a Cup driver?

If he keeps up what he did Sunday, I'm sure returning to the world of being a substitute teacher can be easily arranged by NASCAR.

ALRIGHT, IT'S TIME FOR YOU TO BE HEARD: Head on over to our new site, RACINGDEBATES.com (click on link and it will take you directly there), and let us know what you think about the Edwards/Keselowski imbroglio. 



Read more...

Saturday, March 06, 2010 By: Jerry Bonkowski 0 Responses
SAY HELLO TO RACINGDEBATES.com !

Hey everyone:

What are the two things most likely to happen whenever you get race fans together, regardless of the form of motorsports?

First, they want to watch all the thrills, chills and spills that are inherent in racing.

Second, when they're not watching racing, they're talking racing -- more often than not, that includes debating the merits of a particular race or how "MY DRIVER" stacks up against "YOUR DRIVER."

Ever since we began Trading Paint more than six years ago, one thing that has stood out has been the communication between fans and myself, or fans vs. other fans.

That's one of the main reasons I decided to write "Trading Paint: 101 Great NASCAR Debates", which hits bookstores in summer (look for it!).

We received such great input to our recent inaugural debate on Trading Paint @ JerryBonkowski.com that we decided to break things off into a more dedicated venue that would specialize in that type of thing.

With that being said, I'm pleased to announce the launch of a new addition to the Trading Paint family: RACINGDEBATES.com, a friendly kind of place where you can post your thoughts -- pro, con or otherwise -- not only about NASCAR, but other forms of motorsports including NHRA drag racing, Izod Indy Racing League, Formula One, World of Outlaws, etc.

We've started off with two debates already, and even though we plan on posting at least one new debate every week for you to comment about, the e-mails we've received already are encouraging us to potentially post a new debate sooner than once a week, perhaps one every second or third day -- with the ultimate goal of potentially leading to a daily debate.

We don't want to overwhelm new visitors to the site, so we'll keep it simple for now, but I promise you that a daily debate WILL be coming eventually -- hopefully sooner, rather than later. Right now, we're starting slow, getting our sea legs under us, and then, look out! 

Our goal is simple: to become the No. 1 place where racing fans can come to debate their points. After all, the fan is always right, right?

So, come check out RACING DEBATES.com right now. Like a switchboard reservation agent, we're waiting to hear from YOU!

Read more...

Wednesday, March 03, 2010 By: Jerry Bonkowski 9 Responses
WHO CAN STOP JIMMIE JOHNSON FROM A 5TH SPRINT CUP?


Hey everyone, as many of you know, my first book (Trading Paint: 101 Great NASCAR Debates) will be released this summer. So, to start getting some buzz going about the book, we're going to start posting a weekly debate question here on JerryBonkowski.com to get your thoughts and opinions.

This week's question: Who Can Stop Jimmie Johnson From Winning a 5th Sprint Cup Title?

In my mind, if Johnson is to be stopped in 2010 from winning Title No. 5, it will be Tony Stewart with the best shot and Johnson's own Hendrick Motorsports teammates, Jeff Gordon and Mark Martin, right behind.

So, what's your take: Who Can Stop Jimmie Johnson From Winning A 5th Sprint Cup Title?

(Photo: Rusty Jarrett/Getty Images for NASCAR)

Read more...

MCMURRAY'S DAYTONA 500 WIN PROVES NICE GUYS DO FINISH FIRST

Monday, February 15, 2010 By: Jerry Bonkowski 4 Responses


(Photo: Rusty Jarrett/Getty Images for NASCAR)

Be honest. How many of you – other than the most die-hard of his fans – would have picked Jamie McMurray to win Sunday's 52nd running of the Daytona 500?

But at the same time, I'm not surprised one bit.

Sunday's win was his third restrictor plate victory, adding to triumphs at Daytona in summer 2007 and last fall at Talladega.

More importantly, after nearly eight seasons on the Sprint Cup circuit, Jamie Mac finally lived up to all the expectations that have been made for him throughout his career – yet for one reason or other has never been able to quite reach.

He's now what many people thought he could be: a champion. Sure, it's a Daytona 500 champion, not a Sprint Cup champion, but he's a champion nonetheless.

And, if he can proudly claim one championship now, who is to say he can't go on to win the other, even more important championship when the season ends 35 races from now?

There's an old adage that nice guys are the most deserving winners, and that couldn't be more true in McMurray's case. Ever since he left Joplin, Mo., to find his fame, fortune and future in NASCAR, he's always been one of the nicest, friendliest and most down-to-earth drivers to be around.

Back when he was running the ASA Midwest circuit in the mid-to-late 1990s, McMurray drove a season for a team sponsored by the suburban Chicago salon where I get my hair cut. Every time I see the owner, Lisa Thomas, she always asks how Jamie's doing.

One conversation we had a few years ago, Lisa wished Jamie would have even greater success than he had up to that point.

"He deserves it. He's the nicest guy," she said.

And she's right, not to mention probably the 10,000th person in this world that has made a similar comment about McMurray.

If there was a knock about his being so nice, it's that some critics felt McMurray was a bit too nice, a bit too timid and was more of a fall guy than the chosen one. But that's McMurray's nature, and he should not be judged negatively if he's not boisterous or cantankerous like some of his racing peers.

Look at it from another perspective: how often have we seen drivers in NASCAR leave one team, only to return to that same team a few years later, and welcomed almost like the prodigal son.

It rarely happens -- but indeed, that's exactly what happened to McMurray. When he left Chip Ganassi Racing following the 2005 season, he felt the opportunity he had to replace Kurt Busch at Jack Roush Racing was too good to pass up.

Sadly, McMurray never realized the expectations and potential in the Roush camp because his teammates – including Mark Martin at the time, as well as Greg Biffle, Carl Edwards, Matt Kenseth and David Ragan – usually got first dibs on equipment, personnel and the like.

That's not a knock at McMurray. That's just how things play out usually when you're with a large multi-car team.

And then, when Roush had to cut a driver and team after the 2009 season to conform to NASCAR's mandate that any one owner could no longer have more than four teams under his/her organizational umbrella, McMurray unfortunately was the odd man out.

But when Martin Truex Jr. decided that his future was best served elsewhere than Earnhardt Ganassi Racing (formerly Dale Earnhardt Inc.), McMurray was arguably one of the best available free agents to fill Truex's shoes there. Ironically enough, McMurray won Sunday's race with Truex's old crew chief, Kevin "Bono" Mannion. You have to wonder if Truex isn't maybe kicking himself slightly for having left EGR after last season.

And boy, is majority team owner Chip Ganassi ever thanking his lucky stars he welcomed Jamie back, for he was able to give the Chipster something no other Cup driver has: a Daytona 500 win to go along with wins in the Rolex 24 and, most importantly, several in the Indianapolis 500.

And it was all because McMurray did not burn any bridges when he left what used to be known as Chip Ganassi Racing.

"I've said before, you know, when it's time to hire a driver, you always take the best guy that's available," Ganassi said. "And that's a mantra that our team has lived by for a long time. We obviously had a history with Jamie.

"I might point out ... this was his second first win with us (McMurray won in place of the injured Sterling Marlin in 2002 at Charlotte). For those of you that were around back in the day in Charlotte there, that was a pretty emotional day as well for us."

McMurray learned a valuable lesson upon his return to the Ganassi fold after last season: while moving to Roush for 2006 may have looked like a better opportunity at the time, it proved the old saying right that the grass isn't always greener on the other side of the hill.

"I'm not quitting again, just so you guys know, I'm staying," McMurray said to Ganassi and minority team owner Felix Sabates with a laugh.

When McMurray climbed out of his race car following a couple of celebratory burnouts, he grabbed the checkered flag from the track flag man, walked back to his car, dropped to his knees and kissed the white Daytona 500 logo that was painted on the infield grass before he made his way to victory lane, overwhelmed with emotion.

"It's unreal, unbelievable really," McMurray said between his tears of joy. "I can't explain it. It's a dream. It really is. To be where I was last year and have Johnny Morris (CEO of primary sponsor Bass Pro Shops) and Chip and Felix take a chance on me and let me come back, it means a lot to me. What a way to pay them back."

There's another reason why McMurray's win Sunday wasn't exactly a complete surprise. He continued a trend that has now reached four years of drivers who not only made a late-race kick – he led just the final two laps of the event, the fewest ever by a race winner in Daytona 500 history – but also were not exactly household names when it came to picking favorites to win the 500 going into it.

I mean, how many people picked Kevin Harvick to win the 2007 Daytona 500, Ryan Newman in 2008 and Matt Kenseth last year? I'd say it's safe to guess not all that many, with most people going for guys like Tony Stewart, Jeff Gordon, Jimmie Johnson, Carl Edwards and the like.

Ergo, how many people picked McMurray to win in 2010? Oh yeah, and might I mention he was a minimum 30-1 pre-race pick by Vegas bookies.

"You know, you got to be lucky, though, to win these," McMurray said afterward. "I've been able to put myself in a really good position the last two plate tracks. So, I mean, I don't think it's an upset. I think, you know, it's really tough for, you know, a new driver and crew chief and team to all come together and to be able to win in their first race. That's huge."

When it came time to make my picks to win Sunday's race, I chose Stewart, but I also added a caveat that Juan Pablo Montoya was my dark horse if Stewart fell short.

Well, Stewart did fall short, and maybe I had the wrong driver as my dark horse, but I nailed the right organization for which I can take some consolation.

And consider Sunday's irony. McMurray wins the race for EGR/the former DEI by defeating the son of the company's late founder, Dale Earnhardt by a mere .110 of a second. Junior left DEI after 2007 to race for Hendrick Motorsports.

"I looked in my mirror and saw the 88 (Earnhardt)," McMurray said. "I'll be honest, I was like, 'Crap, this guy has won a lot of races here. His family has an incredible history here.'"

But McMurray was not to be denied.

"You know, I believe everything happens for a reason," he said. "I just was like, I hope this isn't his (Earnhardt's) turn to win the Daytona 500, I hope this is mine."

Give credit where it's due, though: for Junior to come back from 10th to 2nd in less than one lap is a spectacular rally. And, frankly, if he would have had maybe another backstretch to go, Junior may very well have overtaken McMurray for the checkered flag – one that required an additional eight laps of "overtime" due to two caution periods that helped set up McMurray's triumph.

Given how terrible he was in 2009, finishing a career-worst 25th in the final standings, you would have thought Earnhardt would have been jumping for joy after crossing the finish line Sunday.

Instead, he needlessly sulked.

"I'm disappointed to come back that far and finish so close," Earnhardt said dejectedly. "I know we ran second and probably shouldn’t have. It's just frustrating to come that close and not do it."

Finally, he begrudgingly added, "But, we had a good run."

Sunday, McMurray not only lived up to years of expectations and potential, he couldn't have picked a better car – or car number – to win the biggest race of his life.

"I told the guys in the team meeting today, this one you will never forget if we have the opportunity to win this," Mannion said. "The rest of your life, you will never forget a win at Daytona, and especially the Daytona 500."

Many people have already started calling Sunday's race one of the best in many a year in Daytona 500 annals, and I'd concur with that. Not only was the outcome exciting, it couldn't have been much more fitting, for the man who drives car No. 1 definitely wound up being the No. 1 driver, as well.

And who says nice guys don't finish first? Sunday a genuinely nice guy did just that.

Read more...

JEFF GORDON JUST GETTING HIS SECOND WIND BEFORE 40

Monday, February 08, 2010 By: Jerry Bonkowski 1 Response


Photo by Getty ImagesBefore he became a father two years ago, Jeff Gordon said there would be no way he'd still be racing at the age of 40.

"I probably did say that," Gordon said recently, laughing with acknowledgment. "Things change, life changes. You have kids and that changes things."

Now that he's 38 and with a second child on the way (due in early August), Gordon's perspective has indeed changed significantly. Instead of hanging around for just one more year and then calling it quits, he's extending his racing timeline and horizon considerably.

"There was a time I thought 2010 would be my last year," Gordon said. "I've always said that it's not for me to pick and choose because it takes – you have to be healthy, competitive, you know. If you have those two things, then you're going to hopefully enjoy what you're doing. Those three components are what's going to keep me in the sport until that day or season comes to an end. I don't want to put a date on it."

Yet at the same time, Gordon kind of has an idea – revised, as it were. But even that comes with a similar caveat to not driving past 40.

"I don't think I'm not going to be driving at 50 – but I don't want to say that's definite," Gordon said. "I want to keep driving as long as I'm healthy and competitive and as long as Rick (team owner Rick Hendrick) wants to put me in the car."

Much of Gordon's change of mind and heart is due to the incredible performance of Hendrick Motorsports teammate Mark Martin, who is racing at 50 better most of his peers are doing at 25, 30 and even 35 years of age. Martin won five races last year and was runner-up for the fifth time in his career (still without a Cup championship) – with Gordon close behind in third place.

"Mark to me, has always been a huge inspiration," Gordon said. "I've always looked at him in awe at the physical shape he keeps himself in. He's been doing that for a long time. It's not like it all just started.

"(Physical conditioning) didn't affect me back then, 10-15 years ago when we were battling championships. But what happens is now I'm getting older, I see my body changing, I see the intensity of the sport – where yeah, we still have the same number of races – but how hard you have to push every weekend, and then the final 10. To really be in the race to win the championship, you have to be in better physical shape. That's what's motivating me.

"I think Mark, if you asked him 10 or 12 years ago, he'd have said he wasn't going to race at 50, and yet here he is."

And here is Gordon, who turns 39 on August 1.

Just as he's done each of the last eight years, Gordon is once again back in the hunt for his fifth career Cup championship. He's tied for third for most championships with teammate Jimmie Johnson, who has won the last four in a row, and behind Richard Petty and the late Dale Earnhardt, who both won seven Cup titles in their respective careers.

That Johnson has been so successful is a dual-edged sword for Gordon. On the one hand, he's happy for his teammate, particularly since Gordon is part-owner of Johnson's No. 48 team along with Rick Hendrick.

But on the other hand, Gordon, like every other competitor out there, would like to see himself in victory lane more often – and Johnson less so.

"You're frustrated," Gordon said. "You're like, you know what, I'm tired of seeing those guys win and being up there on the stage. I remember that happened when I came along with Earnhardt. Then it happened with me. Now it's happened with Jimmie. That's just competition."

And with each passing year that goes by without the driver of the No. 24 claiming Cup title No. 5, the sense of urgency increases. That, despite Gordon saying two years ago, after Johnson had won his second straight title, that he doubted if he'd ever tie Petty and Earnhardt's mark, let alone win a fifth championship.

"And I'm okay with that," Gordon said at the time.

But with his new-found desire to stretch his Cup career as long as he can, Gordon is definitely reinvigorated to not only win that fifth title and pull closer to Petty and Earnhardt's shared mark, but also to be the guy that knocks Johnson off his throne.

"Heck yeah, you're darn right," Gordon said. "I don't have a whole lot of years left in me. I don't know how many exactly that is. But I'm certainly tapering down toward the latter side of my career. And so those years are winding down, those opportunities are winding down. I want to take full advantage of the fact that we've got the best organization out there. I've got a great team. We're still capable of winning championships. I want to take full advantage of it."

Had the Chase for the Sprint Cup format not been put into place in 2004, Gordon likely would have had two more championships under his belt by now. There's nothing Gordon can do to change it, so he can only forge ahead and do what he can do.

"I would love to get back and win – see, I don't look at it as five (championships)," Gordon said. "I look at it as one. I've never won a Sprint Cup. The sport has changed in how you race for a championship since how that's come along. It's also motivation. I don't like a points system change or a car change to dictate whether or not, you know, we can win championships. I feel like, you know, all the racing I've done, I've been able to win in a lot of different types of cars and tracks. I want to keep that going."

And that starts with the season-opening Daytona 500 this Sunday. Gordon is in pursuit of his fourth career win in the Great American Race, having previously reached victory lane in 1997, 1999 and most recently, 2005.

Since then, however, Gordon's last four finishes in the 500 have been less than inspiring: 26th in 2006, 10th in 2007, 39th in 2008 and 13th in last year's race.

"Well, you know, the Daytona 500 is the Daytona 500," Gordon said. "There's not a guy out there that doesn't want to win it, doesn't think they can win it. At this point in the season every year, everybody feels like they've got what it takes, not only to win this race but to win the championship.

"Daytona is special. You know, you analyze every lap more here than you do probably any other race because there's so much riding on the line. There's so much buildup and anticipation getting to this event. If you win one race all year, this is the one you want to win."

Winning, unfortunately, has been few and far between for Gordon of late. After six wins in 2007, the most wins in a single season that he's had since 2001, Gordon has just one win in his last 77 Cup starts: after being shut out totally of victory lane in 2008, he won just one race last season, at Texas.

"It's been frustrating, for sure," Gordon said. "We pride ourselves with the No. 24 Chevrolet and here at Hendrick that we've won a lot of races over the years. And we also know that our teammates are winning races. And if we're really going to be a factor in the championship, we have to win more races.

"I was so excited the way we started off last season, we were competitive everywhere we went, we won Texas and maintained that for a few more races, but then we either lost what we had or the competition caught up with us. This year, I hope we can reverse that, that we can ramp up as the season goes on and we get better and we put ourselves in position to win more races. I certainly think we have that capability still in us, the fire's still there, the desire, the tools we need and the resources."

For all the critics who have espoused that Gordon has lost some of his edge since marrying for a second time and then becoming a father for the first time, Gordon would beg to differ with that.

"Winning, especially as little as we've been doing lately, it never gets old," he said. "You never know when that next win's gonna come. And experiencing victory is still one of the greatest thrills you'll have ever have. It's because of the hard work and how difficult it is to win. So I never take that for granted. And certainly the last couple years have been great, humbling experiences for our team to motivate ourselves even more to get back into winning fashion."

(Photos: Getty Images for NASCAR)

Read more...